
Often a headache for investors, succession planning in founder-led businesses can impede value creation if not managed effectively. We interviewed 20+ private equity investment professionals and CEOs, all with direct experience with founder-led companies, to delve deeper into the topic.
Investors also have to weigh what the founder means to the organization. As one interviewee put it: what are the broader ramifications of how the founder affects the organization? Are they critical? Is keeping the founder long-term a net plus, a neutral, or really a loss?
Investors need to calmly, dispassionately and repeatedly make the case that a capable bench enhances valuation and performance. Knowing when the founder is critical to culture, and when culture is a driving value proposition, is key to assessing the founder's essentiality. Seize natural inflection points to start the conversation: pre- and post-LOI, during the first 100 days, and when hiring new talent.
Convey an attitude of detached but supportive curiosity, rather than becoming emotionally attached to a certain outcome. As one investor observed, a common dynamic is a founder saying they want to retire at 60 who ends up working until 70. It might be ego; they love what they do and feel part of the company. It is part of their identity, and the thought of walking away leaves a void.
What's got you thinking about this, and why is it important right now?
Who have you talked with about this, internally and externally? How have those conversations
gone?
Help me understand the big picture. As you look to the future, what is next for you?
What's the five-year business goal? What role will you play in driving it, and who else might
play a big part?
Motivation commonly includes a mortality event, a promise to a spouse or
partner, a long-standing personal wealth goal, or a desire to give back and fund a legacy.
Resistance commonly includes an inability to relinquish equity or control; fear
of losing influence, prestige, meaning, identity or productivity; and the absence of strong
relationships or interests outside the business.
Twenty years in, she had built a retail empire with two blockbuster brands and $3B in annual revenue. The opportunity to cash out was appealing, but seismic industry shifts shortly after the transaction led to cold feet. No one knew the organization better, but fresh thinking was needed to pivot in the new landscape. After numerous fits and starts, Ampersand was engaged to address the founder's reservations: she was scared to take the leap into retirement. Focused coaching and introductions to outside boards eased her fear of losing influence and enabled her to envision what she could accomplish next. Two years later she completed a successful handoff to an internal leader. Today the brands dominate their space and have evolved effectively under the new executive.
Succession is a process, not a person. The question is not "who will succeed you?" but "what kind of legacy do you want to leave, and how can we get there together?"